Hungary slovakia icj. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

Hungary slovakia icj. The case raised a number of very important questions of international law, many of which had received no previous consideration in the Court's jurisprudence. Abstract. A. Sep 25, 1997 · Judgment 1. 92 co 977 treaty provides ti project expanded 200 km from Budapest, Hungary to Bratislava, Slovakia. The Gabcíkovo–Nagymaros Project case involved a dispute between Hungary and Slovakia over a 1977 treaty for a joint hydroelectric dam, with the ICJ acknowledging wrongful acts by both parties but failing to enforce compliance or impose sanctions. In the Contentious cases organized by State Hungary Treatment in Hungary of Aircraft and Crew of United States of America (United States of America v. By a letter dated 2 July 1993, filed in the Registry of the Court on the same day, the Ambassador of the Republic of Hungary (hereinafter called "Hungary") to the Netherlands and the Chargé d'affaires ad interim of the Slovak Republic (hereinafter called "Slovakia") to the Netherlands jointly notified to the Court a Special Agreement in English that had been signed at Brussels on Sep 25, 1997 · No. The ICJ was established in 1945 by the San Francisco Conference, which also created the UN. Factual Background 1 On 2 July 1993, the Republic of Hungary (‘Hungary’) and the Slovak Republic (‘Slovakia’) jointly instituted proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in respect of a dispute concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros project. It called on both countries to Sep 26, 1997 · 19970926 The HAGUE, 25 September, (ICJ) -- The International Court of Justice today delivered judgement on a protracted dispute between Hungary and Slovakia over the construction and operation of dams on the river Danube which found both States in breach of their legal obligations. It had political and historical consequences before, during and after the regime change. Czechoslovakia later built a provisional dam without Hungary. The document provides an overview of the Danube Dam case between Hungary and Slovakia. The case dealt with a 1977 treaty be-tween the two countries that created a joint project to construct a series of dams and barrages on the Danube River, which runs along the Proceedings in this case were instituted in the International Court of Justice by Hungary and Slovakia ("the parties") on 2 July 1993 by joint notification of a Special Agreement signed at Brussels on 7 April 1993. Czechoslovakia countered by continuing construction of 'variant C', appropriating 80-90% of the river's water. This Final Mapping Report – Justice Under Pressure: Strategic Litigation Defending Judicial Independence in Europe – aims to identify key obstacles, opportunities, and best Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Oral proceedings Verbatim record 1997/2 (bilingual version) Public sitting held on Monday 3 March 1997, at 10. The project co stituted of two series of locks, one in Slovakia and another in Hungary. Slovakia) (ICJ, 25-09-1997) Casus Hongarije en Tsjecho-Slowakije hadden in 1977 een verdrag gesloten om een gezamenlijk stuwmeer te creëren om daar energie uit te winnen. Due to the change in circumstances, Hungary and Slovakia petitioned the I. Thus, it is unavoidable to understand the concerns and claims of the parties. Czechoslovakia then unilaterally constructed "Variant C" to divert the Danube and build a dam at Title Special agreement between the Republic of Hungary and the Slovak Republic for submission to the International Court of Justice of the differences between them concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project, jointly notified to the Court on 2 July 1993 = Compromis entre la République de Hongrie et la République slovaque visant à soumettre à la Cour internationale de justice les Title Special agreement between the Republic of Hungary and the Slovak Republic for submission to the International Court of Justice of the differences between them concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project, jointly notified to the Court on 2 July 1993 = Compromis entre la République de Hongrie et la République slovaque visant à soumettre à la Cour internationale de justice les Oct 7, 1998 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Hungary to file by 7 December 1998 a written statement of its position on Slovakia's request for an additional Judgment 337 of the European Communities, Hungary and Slovakia were una- ble to resolve their differences, and in 1993 the dispute was sub- mitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for adjudica- tion. However, due to environmental concerns, Hungary suspended and eventually abandoned its agreed upon portions of the project. Hungary's internal division complicates its negotiation stance, affecting its ability to present a unified front. Jan 17, 2025 · The event – Slovakia, Hungary and Poland: How can strategic litigation protect Judicial Independence? – brought together EU stakeholders, CSOs, and experts to discuss judicial independence and the findings of the new report Justice Under Pressure: Strategic Litigation of Judicial Independence in Europe. While Hun- Sep 25, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Summaries of Judgments and Orders Summary 1997/1 Summary of the Judgment of 25 September 1997 Available in: English French Sep 25, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Judgments Judgment of 25 September 1997 Available in: English French Bilingual Apr 9, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Second round of hearings - Visit by the Court to the area to which the case relates 1 day ago · Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project Case (Hungary/Slovakia, ICJ, 1997): The ICJ reaffirmed that treaties violating environmental norms could be invalidated if they conflict with peremptory norms. Both Hungary and Slovakia are obligated to 135 not undertake actions that may cause pollution or contamination in the jurisdiction of other countries. Slovakia argued that Hungary was still bound by its treaty obligation. In 1989, Hungary suspended and later abandoned its work on the project, citing environmental concerns. 2 The case arose out of the signature, on 16 September 1977, by Hungary and the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (‘Czechoslovakia’), of We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The Court also found that Slovakia's unilateral diversion of the Danube to implement Variant C constituted a Jul 2, 1993 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Institution of proceedings Special Agreement 2 July 1993 Available in: English French Jul 7, 2011 · Under intense pressure from the EU, in April 1993 Hungary and Slovakia agreed to submit the dispute to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). 92 [1997] FACTS: A treaty was entered into by the Hungarian People’s Republic and Czechoslovak Socialist Republic in relation to the construction and operation of the GabcikoNagymaros System of Locks. Cables:IntercourtThe Hague. This paper looks at the milestone case of the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), wherein the damming of the Danube and The Treaty of 16 September 1977 concerning the construction Sep 25, 2020 · On April 1-4, 1997, the International Court of Justice visited the sites of the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project in Slovakia and Hungary. Hongarije besluit op een gegeven moment het verdrag op te zeggen, mede omdat er ecologische problemen zijn ontstaan. After a period of time, Hungary gave notice of the termination of the treaty. Slovakia Order In its Judgment in the case concerning Gabcikovo- Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), the Court found that Hungary was not entitled to suspend and ¡subsequently abandon, in 1989, its part of the works in the dam project, as laid down in the treaty signed in 1977 by Hungary and Czechoslovakia and related instruments; it also found that Czechoslovakia was entitled to start, in November 1991 Hungary contended that Slovakia's arguments rested on an erro- neous presentation of the facts and the law. 2) The ICJ ruled that neither country was fully justified in their actions. Despite the judgment, Hungary and Slovakia have failed to reach a settlement since 1997 due to incompatible national positions. Sep 25, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Summaries of Judgments and Orders Feb 5, 1997 · 5 February 1997 General List No. 2) The ICJ visited the dam site in 1997, a first for the court, to gather evidence. M. Therefore, it 136 is incumbent upon Hungary and Slovakia to provide scientific evidence that any future construction of Nagymaros 137 or Varient-C would not violate general principles of Sep 25, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Judgments Judgment of 25 September 1997 Available in: English French Bilingual JUDGMENT 1. . C. Whether, in November 1991, the Czech and Slovak Federal Jul 21, 2017 · The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, placed on record the discontinuance by the Slovak Republic of the procedure begun by means of its Request for an additional judgment filed on 3 September 1998 in the case concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). Slovakia and Hungary enter into bi-lateral negotiations with an impartial mediator to help facilitate productive 24 negotiations between the two parties, 25 (a) The negotiations should include a consideration of Hungary paying reparations to Slovakia. 0 1. Whether the 1977 Treaty was ever in force between Hungary and Slovakia. 2) In 1989, Hungary suspended work and in 1992 terminated the treaty, while Czechoslovakia began alternative works on the river. 5. Nicaragua v. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Telex32323. The key points are: 1) Hungary and Slovakia submitted the case to the ICJ in 1993 over disputes arising from the 1977 treaty to construct the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros dam system. After setting out the text of the Agreement, the Court recited the successive stages of the proceedings and referred, inter alia, to its visit to the area from 1 to 4 April 1997 on The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, placed on record the discontinuance by the Slovak Republic of the procedure begun by means of its Request for an additional judgment filed on 3 September 1998 in the case concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). While the Court While Czechoslovakia divided into two separate states, Hungary too under significant change in government. Ryan Law Case Brief 1 9/16/09 ia International Court of Justice 1997 25 September General List No. Then, the questions submitted A. Hungary and Slovakia had signed a 1977 treaty to construct dams along the Danube River, but Hungary later abandoned the project due to environmental concerns. In 1977, Hungary and Czechoslovakia entered into a treaty to construct the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros System of Locks on the Danube River to generate hydroelectric power. It sits in The Hague, Netherlands and is composed of fifteen independent Justices from around the world. Slovakia ICJ GL No. 3) The ICJ ruled that the 1977 treaty remained in force, and that both states had committed internationally wrongful 7 April 1993, the "Special Agreement for Submission to the International Court of Justice of the Differences between the Republic of Hungary and the Slovak Republic concerning the GabEikovo-Nagymaros Project" was signed in Brussels, the text of which is reproduced in paragraph 2 above. 2. To Slovakia, the dams represented an important achievement of the Slovak nation in the modern world. Each count y Sep 25, 1997 · No. Hungary's decision to suspend and abandon the project in 1989 was deemed unjustified by the International Court of Justice, which found that Hungary could not invoke a state of necessity to excuse its Abstract: In the ever-evolving domain of international law, there are milestone cases and rulings that bring forth new international norms and mark the beginnings of jurisprudence on certain matters. It called on both countries to Here, the court is in the reference to the International Court of Justice or byname the World Court, the principle judicial organ of the United Nations. Does the corpus of international law which relates to the environment now consists of the general obligations of states to ensure that activities within their The document summarizes the 1997 ICJ judgment in the case between Hungary and Slovakia concerning the Gabcikovo–Nagymaros Project. In September 1997, the World Court held that both Hungary and Slovakia violated international law during the course of this dispute. Tel (070-302 23 23). Communiqué unorricial ror imme~ia elease No. According to Article 26, Paragraph 2c and 3 of the 1977 Treaty, the contracting parties were bound to compensate the other party for any issues resulting from improper performance under the Treaty. This project never saw the light of the day and the two countries went through different changes in their political and economic systems beginning in 1989. 7 (1997), reprinted in 37 I. It provides background on a 1977 treaty between Hungary and Czechoslovakia to construct a system of dams and locks. Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) (International Court of Justice, The Hague, 25 September 1997) Slovakia was only willing to discuss the question of how much water would be released into the old riverbed in the context of the construction of a dam according to the treaty of 1977. The judgment highlighted the limitations of international law in ensuring treaty adherence and resolving conflicts, supporting the argument that May 2, 1994 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Written proceedingsMemorial of the Republic of Hungary The Court recognizes that the special agreement of July 2, 1993, between Hungary and Slovakia, serves this purpose. It considered that "no such rule" of "approximate application" of a treaty Jul 2, 1993 · On 3 September 1998, Slovakia filed in the Registry of the Court a request for an additional Judgment in the case. Hungary denied, inter alia, having committed the slightest violation of its treaty obligations which could have justified the putting into operation of Variant C. The case concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project arose from a treaty signed in 1977 between Hungary and Czechoslovakia for the construction of a joint hydroelectric system on the Danube River. m. 2 The case arose out of the signature, on 16 September 1977, by Hungary and the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (‘Czechoslovakia’), of Sep 25, 1997 · The Gabcikovo-Nagymaros project (Hungary vs. Such project was established for the facilitation and construction of dams on Danube River and for the broad utilization of the natural Contentious cases organized by State Slovakia Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Pending cases 21 July 2017 Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - The Court places on record the discontinuance by Slovakia of the procedure begun by means of its Request for an additional judgment Available in: 10 - The judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) from PART I - International Court of Justice Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011 Hungary and Slovakia, the ICJ was asked to consider, for the first time, the consequences of the legal developments in the field of environmental protection (Environment, International Protection). Synopsis of Rule of Law. By a letter dated 2 July 1993, filed in the Registry of the Court on the same day, the Ambassador of the Republic of Hung Slovakia and Hungary petitioned the International Court of Justice to hear their dispute. 97/8 15 April 1997 Case concerning the GabCik;oyo-Nagymaros Project Œungary/Slovakia) Conclusion of the hearings • THE HAGUE, 15April. The Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project is not just a dispute between Hungary and Slovakia. Jul 2, 1993 · On 3 September 1998, Slovakia filed in the Registry of the Court a request for an additional Judgment in the case. Slovakia proceeded with an alternative solution, called "Variant C", which involved diverting the Danube, the border river. Beuring in nlind that the Slovak Republic is one of the two successor States of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and the sole successor State in respect of rights and obligations relating to the GabCikovo-Nagy- maros Project ; Recognizing that the Parties concerned have been unable to settle these differences by negotiations; Huving in The project aims to promote independent and effective judicial systems to protect fundamental rights by strengthening the knowledge and ability of lawyers and civil society organizations in national and European strategic litigation, focusing on eight EU Member States – Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Malta Dec 20, 1994 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Orders Order of 14 July 1993 Fixing of time-limits: Memorials and Counter-Memorials Available in: English French Bilingual Facts. The ICJ ruled Hungary's treaty termination lacked legal grounds Sep 3, 1998 · Court of Justice (ICJ) a request for an additional Judgment in the case conceming Gabëikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) relating to the construction and operation Facts. The International Court of Justice today delivered judgment on a protracted dispute between Hungary and Slovakia over the construction and operation of dams on the river Danube which found both States in breach of their legal obligations. These caused a still unresolved international dispute between Slovakia and Hungary. The ICJ found that both states failed to respect their treaty Jan 17, 2008 · The dispute between Hungary and Slovakia concerning the Gabcïkovo-Nagymaros project could easily be described as one of the most important cases to come before the International Court of Justice (“the Court”) in recent years. By this point, the symbolism of the dams had been firmly set in each country. Telefilx (070-36499 28). Jul 2, 1993 · Reproduced with the permission of the International Court of Justice : Link1 Official source Documents of the case Judgment - 25 Sept 1997 Dissenting Opinion of Judge Vereshchetin Dissenting Opinion of Judge Herczegh Dissenting Opinion of Judge Ranjeva Declaration of President Schwebel Dissenting Opinion of Judge Oda INTRODUCTION On September 25, 1997, the International Court of Justice (ICJ)1 decided the Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project,2 resolving a long-standing dispute between the countries of Hungary and Slovakia. Firstly, the complexity of prior events – which led to the escalation of the debate – is outlined. Communiqué 1m0fficial for immediate re1ease No. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace,2517 KJ The Hague. 3) In its 1997 judgment, the ICJ ruled that This document summarizes a case heard by the International Court of Justice concerning the damming of the Danube River between Hungary and Slovakia. Hungarian Peoples Republic) Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) 1) Hungary and Czechoslovakia signed a treaty in 1977 to construct a system of locks on the Danube River for water management and energy production. Hungary (P) claimed that Czechoslovakia (D) violated the provisions of a treaty when it appropriated the waters of the Danube River to construct a dam. 1. Jul 2, 1993 · On 3 September 1998, Slovakia filed in the Registry of the Court a request for an additional Judgment in the case. Decision of the International Court of Justice The Court considered three primary legal issues: ( 1) Whether Hungary had a legal right to suspend and then abandon the project in 1989; (2) Whether Slovakia had the legal right to operate Variant C; and The event will discuss the status quo for judicial independence in Hungary, Poland and Slovakia and present a report exploring how strategic litigation can be used to protect judicial independence in EU Member States. for resolution after disputes arose between them. Hungary (D) was the first to stop and Oct 17, 2021 · Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case (1997) ICJ By Hesham Elrafei gabcikovo nagymaros dam construction case In 1977, Hungary and Czechoslovakia signed a treaty to construct a dam. Sep 25, 1997 · 25 September 1997 General List No. The Court held, by clear majorities, that both Hungary and Slovakia had breached their obligations under the bilateral Treaty on the Construction and Operation of the The ICJ judgment largely met Hungarian environmental goals, deeming the Nagymaros barrage unnecessary. Slovakia proceeded alone with the project. Whether, in 1989, Hungary was entitled to suspend and subsequently abandon the works on the Gabčikovo–Nagymaros project for which the Treaty on the Construction and Operation of the Gabčikovo–Nagymaros Barrage System attributed responsibility to Hungary. , at the Peace Palace, President Schwebel presiding Available in: Original Language Feb 17, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Visit by the Court to the site of the Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros hydro-electric dam project Feb 17, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Visit by the Court to the site of the Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros hydro-electric dam project 1 On 2 July 1993, the Republic of Hungary (‘Hungary’) and the Slovak Republic (‘Slovakia’) jointly instituted proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in respect of a dispute concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros project. 26 Both parties threatened to go to the ICJ again, and in September 1998 Slovakia once more sued Hungary and requested an additional ruling, because Hungary was 1. J. Slovakia Judgement Sep 25, 1997 · On 7 April 1993, the "Special Agreement for Submission to the International Court of Justice of the Differences between the Republic of Hungary and the Slovak Republic concerning the Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project" was signed in Brussels, the text of which is reproduced in paragraph 2 above. 5 The case was noted internationally as the first environmental case to be decided by the ICJ, and therefore one 1. Hungary later suspended work and terminated the treaty, citing ecological concerns, while Slovakia proceeded with alternative plans International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes The International Court of Justice (ICJ), sometimes referred to as the World Court, is the primary judicial organ of the United Nations. Judgment of 25 September 1997 In its Judgment in the case concerning Gabcikovo- Nagymaros Project (HungaryISlovakia), the Court found that Hungary was not entitled to suspend and :subsequently abandon, in 1989, its part ofthe works in the dam project, as laid down in tlie treaty signed in 1977 by Hungary and Czechoslovakia and related instruments; it also found that Czechoslovakia was entitled Sep 25, 1997 · Summaries of Judgments, AdviNot an official document of the Internationa l Court of Justice CASE CONCERNING GABC~KBVO-NAGYMAROS PROJECT (HUNGARY/SILOVAKIA) Judgment of 25 September 1997 In its Judgment in the case concerning Gabcikovo- The complete text of the operative paragraph of the Judgmentis as follows: Nagymaros Project (HungaryISlovakia), the Court found that Hungary was not entitled Oct 26, 1992 · 21 July 2017 Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - The Court places on record the discontinuance by Slovakia of the procedure begun by means of its Request for an additional judgment Available in: On July 2, 1993, Hungary and Slovakia instituted proceedings before the International Court of Justice on the basis of a special agreement signed in Brussels on April 7, 1993. Hungary terminated the 1977 treaty citing environmental concerns and state of necessity, among other reasons. Issue. "Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project, Hungary v Slovakia, Order, Site Visit, [1997] ICJ Rep 3, ICGJ 65 (ICJ 1997), 5th February 1997, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ]" published on by Oxford University Press. Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) (International Court of Justice, The Hague, 25 September 1997) Apr 16, 1997 · Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Other documents Replies of Hungary to questions put by Members of the Court 16 April 1997 Available in: English French Jan 1, 2021 · Case Concerning the GabčíKovo–Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Volume 116 Jan 1, 2021 · Case Concerning the GabčíKovo–Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) - Volume 116 Feb 14, 2025 · The ICJ made its comments in a letter responding to a Statement issued by the NJC on 20 January 2025 objecting to some remarks and commentary made at the ICJ event at the European Parliament on 15 January 2025: Slovakia, Hungary and Poland: How can strategic litigation protect Judicial Independence? But instead of fostering interdependence between Hungary and Slovakia, the project became a heated political and environmental controversy between these two neighbors. 92 international Court of Justice Gabcikovo-Nagumaros Project Hungary v. Legal Consequences of Invalidity According to Article 69 of the VCLT, when a treaty is invalid: The treaty has no legal force. Both parties turned to the International Court of Justice for a ruling. Hungary did not prove Court of Justice (ICJ) a request for an additional Judgment in the case conceming Gabëikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) relating to the construction and operation Jul 15, 1993 · INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Telefax co1 o36499 28). The treaty for the construction of a series of dams along the Danube was signed in 1977 by Hungary (P). to decide whether Hungary was entitled to suspend and abandon its operations. In 1989, Hungary abandoned The International Court of Justice ruled that Hungary was not justified in suspending or abandoning its obligations under the 1977 Treaty for the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project, as it failed to demonstrate an imminent peril and had alternative solutions for its environmental concerns. Brief Fact Summary. Watercourse states shall participate in the use, development and protection of an international watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Other documents Replies of Hungary to questions put by Members of the Court 16 April 1997 Available in: English French 22 Therefore the Justices recommend the following: 1. Get Gabčíkovo -Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), 1997 I. Colombia | ICJ Latest Judgment| Case Summary | 13 July 2023 Quickly learn the important outlines of the 1997 Gabcikovo-Nagymaros project case decided by the International Court of The Gabcikovo-Nagymaros project treaty aimed to utilize the Danube River for hydroelectricity and navigation. Slovakia (D) and Hungary (P) however came before the I. The ICJ is the only court in the world with general and near-universal jurisdiction; countries may […] 1) Hungary and Czechoslovakia signed a 1977 treaty to jointly construct the Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros dam project on the Danube River. Telex 32323. 97/10 25 September 1997 Case concerning Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) Judgment The Hague, 25 September. The hearings in the above case, which started on 3 March 1 On 2 July 1993, the Republic of Hungary (‘Hungary’) and the Slovak Republic (‘Slovakia’) jointly instituted proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in respect of a dispute concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros project. "Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project, Hungary v Slovakia, Judgment, Merits, ICJ GL No 92, [1997] ICJ Rep 7, [1997] ICJ Rep 88, (1998) 37 ILM 162, ICGJ 66 (ICJ 1997), 25th September 1997, International Court of Justice [ICJ]" published on by Oxford University Press. In 1977, Hungary (D) and Slovakia (P) agreed to build and operate a system of locks along the Danube River made up of a dam, reservoir, hydroelectric power plant and flood control improvements. 00 a. L. Slovakia considered such a Judgment necessary because of the unwillingness of Hungary to implement the Judgment delivered by the Court on 25 September 1997. 93/19 15 July 1993 Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungarv/Slovakia) Fixing of time-limits ~· The following information is communicated to the Press by the Registry of the International Court of Justice: By an Order of 14 July 1993 in the above case, the Court, taking into account the THE DANUBE DAM CASE Hungary v. On 7 April 1993, the "Special Agreement for Submission to the International Court of Justice of the Differences Between the Republic of Hungary and the Slovak Republic Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project" was signed in Brussels, the text of which is reproduced in paragraph 2 above. 162 (1998), International Court of Justice, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. 5f2h yzz swav im8 jky gpua5wn pln mk2 gtvkbcq taz9