Milinda nagasena chariot. Nagasena rejects all of these.

Milinda nagasena chariot. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. INTRODUCTION xi The Simhalese version of the Milinda xii Buddhaghosa's four references to it. The Milindapañha (lit. But although parents give name such as Nagasena, or Surasena, or Virasena, or Sihasena, nevertheless, this word "Nagasena" is just a denomination, a designation, a conceptual term, a current Nagasena and the Chariot King Milinda (Menander I), a historical figure, engages in a philosophical dialogue with Nagasena, a Buddhist monk renowned for his wisdom. Karen Sieben Intro Philosophy August 6, 2023 Nagasena and the Analogy of the Chariot In the chapter and accompanying video for this week’s assignment, we are given an overview of a conversation between King Milinda and Nagasena from the book titledMilinda’s Questions. 4) "Does he who is born remain the same or become another?" How does Nagasena respond to this? Feb 24, 2019 · Nagasena — brief biography and historical significance; key ideas and sources for deeper study. The king acknowledges that the chariot is merely a name for the collection of parts. Great Buddhist parable with important lesson. Milinda: “I have not, Nagasena, spoken a falsehood. He so enjoys Nagasena's answers and similes that Sep 19, 2021 · View Nagasena - Questions of King Milinda. But Nagasena told the sentry,” There is nothing like Nagasena here. But King Milinda said to Nagasena: "I have not, Nagasena, spoken a falsehood. And Milinda the king replied to Nâgasena, and said: 'I have spoken no untruth, reverend Sir. Aug 27, 2023 · Nagasena’s Simile of the Chariot comes about as a result of Milinda’s questioning of the self. ' 'Is it the axle that is the chariot But King Milinda said to Nagasena: "I have not, Nagasena, spoken a falsehood. IN what setting do they meet? How does Nagasena introduce himself to the king? Why is the king surprised by what Nagasena initially says ? what is the point of the chariot analogy? The king asks the following question, "Does he who is born remain the same or become another?" How does Nagsena answer this question? The Questions of King Milinda at sacred-texts. What did Nagasena ask the king? He asked the king what type of transport he used. Nov 3, 2023 · King Milinda or Menander was one of the rulers of the Indo-Greek Kingdom from 165 B. C (the first date. Nagasena uses metaphors like a candle flame to explain anatman, the Buddhist concept of non-self Nagasena says that a Chariot is only found with these parts and without them a chariot is not a chariot. Nagasena responds by using the analogy of a chariot: What is a Chariot? (And what are we?) Now Milinda the king went up to where the venerable Nāgasena was, and addressed him with the greetings and compliments of friendship and courtesy, and took his seat respectfully apart. King Milinda asks questions. The Milindapanha presents dialogues between King Milinda and Nagasena, addressing So Milinda the king, attended by the five hundred Yonakas, mounted his royal chariot and proceeded to the Sankheyya hermitage, to the place where Âyupâla dwelt, and exchanged with him the greetings and compliments of friendship and courtesy, and took his seat respectfully apart. And Nāgasena reciprocated his courtesy, so that the heart of the king was propitiated. pdf from PHIL 1115 at University of New Mexico, Main Campus. the answer was a chariot. ] s. Nagasena Upon meeting Nagasena, King Milinda proceeds to ask him questions about whether there is a Self. Throughout the debate Nagasena is using the analogy of a chariot to show the Buddhist way of thinking. Milinda: How is your Reverence known, and what, Sir, is your name? Nagasena: I am Only the formidable Nagasena-miraculously born for this very purpose-was equal to the task. Mendis The Questions of King Milinda The Milindapanha is one of the great classics of Pali Buddhist literature, a spirited dialogue between the Greek king Milinda and the Buddhist sage Nagasena. Milinda Panha There is almost universal agreement that this text was later expanded by Preview text Nagasena says that the concept of a chariot is merely a handle or a form of address. Also I note that ‘the chariot’ in addition to being ‘a collection of parts’, is also a designed object which fulfils a certain function. In effect, Buddhism rejects the key element in folk psychology: the idea of a self (a unified personal identity that is continuous through time). For it is in dependence on the pole, the axle, the wheels, the framework, the flag-staff, etc. The chariot analogya. , referred to by name Pitaka passages quoted Length of the Jun 8, 2025 · The Questions of Milinda is one of the most renowned texts within Theravada Buddhism—and one of the most translated Buddhist texts around the world. involved in the matter, who is it, pray, who gives to you and members of your order your robes and food and lodging and necessaries for the sick? Why or how does Nagasena ultimately prove that King Milinda does not actually have a chariot? I understand that the pole does not make a chariot, nor do the wheels, but won't the components collectively have become a chariot? Dec 29, 2022 · N. The C opens at once with the previous life of Na-hsien and of the king; while the P starts with an introductory gàthà in which Nàgasena and Milinda are introduced with their outstanding qualifications quoted and praised. Nagasena does King Milinda invited Nagasena, a Buddhist monk, to learn Buddha’s teachings. k. During their conversation, King Milinda raises the question of the nature of a person and whether there is a permanent self or soul. When they meet, Milinda asks Nagasena questions about his identity, to which Nagasena responds by likening himself to a chariot - a collection of parts without a fixed essence. ⭐ Join our commu Jun 22, 2012 · I posted a thread on the other Wheel about Milinda’s Chariot. According to this legend, the Emerald Buddha would have been created in India in 43 BC by Nagasena in the city of Pātaliputta. Is it the pole that is the chariot? Milinda: I did not say that. Milinda challenges Nagasena that if he is not a breathing, eating, drinking, sleeping, mortal being, then neither can he behave morally, nor be sinned against. Explanation The simile of the chariot is indeed used by Nagasena in his dialogue with King Milinda to illustrate the concept of no-self (anatman), demonstrating that just as a chariot is made up of parts, so too is the self an aggregation of components without a permanent essence. One chapter of this text contains a well-known exchange in which the sage Nagasena uses the simile of the chariot to explain the concept of "not-self THE CHARIOT And King Milinda asked him: "How is Your Reverence known, and what is your name, sir?" "As Nagasena I am known, O Great King, and as Nagasena do my fellow religious habitually address me. The Milindapañha ("Questions of Milinda") is a text from the Pali Canon that records a dialog between the Buddhist sage Nagasena and Greco-Bactrian king Milinda (a. A chariot is not identical with any one of its parts. Nagasena: Is it the wheels, or the framework, or the ropes, or the yoke, or the spokes of the wheels, or the goad, that are the chariot? King Milinda protested that the chariot existed and that ‘chariot’ was a general name for designating the collection of objects that he arrived in. The Chariot as a simile for dependent origination - King Milinda is a brilliant and formidable King. Nagasena creates the Simile of the Chariot as an answer to Milinda's questioning herself. Is it the pole that is the chariot?' 'I did not say that. What did the King Milinda reply? "It is a mere name". The Chariot Simile of MilindprasnaMilindprasna is a work composed in Pali that purports to be the record of a dialogue between the Buddhist monk, Nagasena and the Greek King, Milinda. " "Your Majesty has spoken well about the chariot. He subsequently constructed a parallel comparison to the Chariot. Osmund Bopearachchi and R. C to 130 B. " Dec 14, 2021 · The plot revolves around a monk named Nagasena, who was nothing more than an accumulation of bits. Nagasena uses the analogy of a chariot to explain that while a person's name refers to the combination of the body and mind, in ultimate reality no single, fixed self can be found Concerning this, Nagasena questions Milinda about what part of a chariot makes it a chariot. In this dialogue between the two men, we are slowly introduced to Nagasena’s . I came in a carriage. Like Nagasena's name. In the Pali book it says that the conversations between King Milinda and Nàgasena took place five hundred years after the Pari-nibbàna of the Buddha. Nagasena responds with no, giving King Milinda the following chariot example. The story of King Milinda, Nagasena and a chariot. He then explained to the king that the name ‘Nāgasena’ was like ‘chariot’, they were both general terms. The Milindapañhā is regarded as canonical in Burmese Buddhism, included as part of the book of Khuddaka Nikāya. In the Milindapanha, the arahant Nagasena describes it well with the talk on the chariot and the parts of the chariot. Jun 3, 2016 · A chariot did, indeed, function to transport King Milinda to Nagasena’s teaching! It is useful to be able to give a chariot a name and then make use of the chariot’s function. The original Milindapañha or The Questions of Milinda (100 BC and 200 AD), now lost, was probably written in Sanskrit or Prakrit in Northern India. John Kelly states: Composed around the beginning of the Common Era, and of unknown authorship, the Milindapañha is set up as a compilation of questions posed by King May 18, 2020 · The text of the Milinda Panha dates back to around 100 BC and covers a series of dialogues between Milinda, an Indo-Greek king, and Nagasena, a Buddhist monk from Kashmir (O’Brien 3). K. MSS. Milinda concludes that if no part of Nagasena can be found, then there is no real person there, and the name Nagasena is just an empty In his dialog with King Milinda, Nāgasena used the simile of the chariot to explain the Buddhist concept of the not-self (anatman). King Milinda and Nagasena (the Buddhist sage) discuss ordinary problems of personal identity. A chariot is not identical with any collection of its parts, Therefore there is no chariot. Mark Arandia PHIL-191-DL 4 March 2022 King Milinda and Nagasena: The theory of self Nagasena’s theory of self and view on human nature has the belief that the self doesn’t exist. " This ancient text presents a fascinating dialogue between King Milinda and the monk Nagasena, exploring profound philosophical questions that resonate even today. Schlechtweg 1 Edward J. Nagasena and King Milinda agree that a chariot is NOT [. For it is in dependence on the pole, the axle, the wheels, the framework, the flag-staff, etc, there takes place this denomination "chariot", this designation, this conceptual term, a current appellation and a mere name. But why couldn’t it be all of these things together, arranged the right way? 1. The text recounts the Sep 3, 2021 · 2 volumes 23 cm Consists of imaginary conversations between Milinda or Menander, king of Bactria and the Buddhist philospher Nâgasena pt 1 = 1890 pt 2 = 1894 Jul 7, 2022 · The story is about a monk called Nagasena, who visited a king called Milinda. They are their individual parts, therfore the word "chariot" is just generally understood the term for common use. They don’t bring him a few wheels or a cart. Aug 4, 2020 · “No,” replies the King. The Questions of Milinda (Milindapañha) is a text from the Pali Canon that records a dialog between the Buddhist sage Nagasena and Bactrian-Greek King Milinda (a. Nagasena states that 'Nagasena' is a mere name, there is no fixed identity to be grasped. Nagasena says that a Chariot is only found with these parts and without them a chariot is not a chariot. In her new Apr 12, 2016 · A portion of the dialogue presents the Buddhist doctrine of anatta or no-self. Nagasena asks if the pole of the The Nagasena stated that a chariot is a combination of all those things, and therefore a chariot is a mere concept or just a name. Mr. What is a Chariot? (And what are we?) Now Milinda the king went up to where the venerable Nāgasena was, and addressed him with the greetings and compliments of friendship and courtesy, and took his seat respectfully apart. org, Public Domain. What is the meaning of The point is that the parts that make up a chariot are not considered the actul chariot. … However, Nagasena explained that the chariot was just a collection of parts, such as wheels and a seat. This abridged edition has been adapted from the long-standing translation by I. Milinda: How is your Reverence known, and what, Sir, is your name? Nagasena: I am Dec 17, 2024 · When diving into the rich and intricate world of Buddhist philosophy, one can't help but stumble upon the "Milinda Panha. In this enlightening video, we delve deep into the ancient Buddhist teaching of "no-self" through the captivating story of Nāgasena and the King of Milinda. It adds an exhortation to listen to We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. a Menander I). He says that nothing exists without something. Thus, Milinda Panha states that Menander was King Milinda questions a monk named Nagasena about Buddhist philosophy, including no-self and rebirth without a soul. It purports to record a dialogue between the Indian Buddhist sage Nāgasena, and the 2nd century BC Indo-Greek king Menander I (Pali: Milinda). Schlechtweg IV Dr. ” Nagasena: “Your Majesty has spoken well about the chariot. Therefore, I believe that Milinda's argument is that if the Bundle Theory is correct, then it is impossible to commit murder. ' 'Then if you came, Sire, in a carriage, explain to me what that is. Jun 26, 2012 · There is a very well-known passage in the Questions of King Milinda, which is the analogy of the Chariot. A sentry knocked on his door the following day to take him to King Milinda via chariot. One chapter of this text contains a well-known exchange in which the sage Nagasena used the simile of the chariot to explain the concept of "not-self" (anatman). When the king asks Nagasena’s name, he replies that Nagasena is indeed what he is called, but that “no permanent individual” named Nagasena existed within him. It sounds a bit confusing, but he is saying that everything has its causes and conditions for it. The effectiveness of these answers The Buddha’s teaching of anatta is that there is no separate self, but this doesn't mean that no functioning being (or thing) exists. Nagasena asks King Milinda if the chariot exists as an independent entity apart from its parts. Chapter 1 3. and edition of the text King Milinda the same as Menander Notices of him in classical writers His coins His birthplace, Kalasi, probably = Karisi The author not the same as Nâgârguna Passages in the Pitakas referred to silently Pâli books, &c. King Milinda questions the Buddhist monk Nagasena on the concept of self or personhood. ” The sentry was surprised to hear such a response when Nagasena stood right before him. In the same way, a designation is something conceptual. 81K subscribers Subscribed So can you tell us a bit about this backstory? What were Milinda and Nagasena's interactions in previous lives? Maria Heim: So the story starts with the person we now know as Milinda as a novice monk in a monastery and the person we now know as Nagasena as a senior monk in the same monastery. King Milinda here speaks as follows: “I came in a chariot. [3] Nov 21, 2023 · Who in their right mind paid Milinda, a royal, a visit? Nagasena, on the other hand, maintained the belief that the Chariot represented nothing more than an assembly of components. "' INTRODUCTION The Simhalese version of the Milinda Buddhaghosa's four references to it. Is there really an “I” behind your thoughts and actions? This classic Buddhist parable uses a chariot to dismantle the illusion of selfhood. and edition of the text xvi King Milinda the same as Menander xviii Notices of him in classical writers xix His coins xx His birthplace, Kalasi, probably = Karisi xxiii The author not the same as Nâgârguna xxv Passages in the Pitakas referred to silently xxvii Pâli books, &c. The text follows a transformational philosophical dialogue between the Indo-Greek king Milinda and a Buddhist monk named Nagasena as they discuss the nature of the self, the meaning of renunciation, and the sources of knowledge. Nagasena then asks if the chariot is all of these constituents put together; or something else over-and-above them. 1) Who are the characters? Where do they meet? a) King Milinda and Nagasena. Horner And Nagasena's response is that the existence of the chariot can be attributed to the pieces themselves. Milinda asks a series of questions highlighting what seem to be anomalies and contradictions in Buddhist doctrine, to each of which Nagasena gives clear, even ingenious answers. Nāgasena was a Buddhist sage who lived about 150 BCE. Study with Quizlet and memorise flashcards containing terms like key quote from nagasena on how names are just merely labels:, key quote from milinda questioning if someone killed the king:, key quotes from milinda questioning what is the self using 5 aggregates: and others. Milindapanha: Questions and Answers of Buddhist Philosophy The Milindapanha records King Milinda’s philosophical inquiries and the monk Nagasena’s insightful responses within its Buddhist teachings. Senior, the other. Nagasena: Then if you came, Sire, in a carriage, explain to me what that is. It became significant in Ceylon (Sri Lanka), where it has been preserved, translated into Pali and Sinhalese, and widely respected. This man of great personality found a prominent place in the writings of classical writers like Strabo and Jul 23, 2023 · How might Western Metaphysicists respond to the puzzle of King Milinda/Nagasena’s Chariot Ask Question Asked 1 year, 10 months ago Modified 1 year, 10 months ago Nov 10, 2020 · The chariot and the ship named Theseus The five aggregates acting in unison give the illusion of a self; a perceived self if you will. He mentions the fact that when he asks his servants to bring him a chariot to ride in, they bring him a whole chariot. Nagasena successfully satisfies all of Menander's curiosity and the impressed Menander asks Nagasena to take him as a disciple of Buddhism under him. just lilke Nagasena's name. The Buddhist scripture "The Questions of King Milinda" contains interesting and very modern arguments about personal identity through time. Nagasena asked what a chariot was - the wheel, or any of the other parts. xiv MSS. Nov 24, 2013 · There's something I don't get in the very beginning of the Questions of King Milinda. who paid a visit to Milinda, a royal? Nagasena, on the other hand, claimed that the chariot was simply a collection of pieces, He subsequently made a comparison towards the chariot. Apr 28, 2017 · I'm sure you all know the story of Venerable Nagasena and King Milinda, where Nagasena explains the emptiness of essential nature of the Kings chariot. Individuality and name; the chariot simile Now Milinda the king went up to where the venerable Nāgasena was, and addressed him with the greetings and compliments of friendship and courtesy, and took his seat respectfully apart. Western philosophy assumes that there are particular, fixed things, separate from other things, Nagasena denies this about the self. The most famous of all the Greek Kings of India is Menander (pronounced as Milinda in Indian Pali sources). And Nagasena's responses are full of wisdom, wit, and helpful analogies. Apr 9, 2024 · The Questions of Milinda (Milindapañha) is a text from the Pali Canon that records a dialog between the Buddhist sage Nagasena and Bactrian-Greek King Milinda (a. King Milinda says that a chariot can just exist as a chariot. 3. [1] An abridged King Milinda in discussion with Nagasena. B. " Buddha's teaching on nonself or anatta. 'Questions of Milinda') is a Buddhist text which dates from sometime between 100 BC and 200 AD. King Milinda poses questions about dilemmas raised by Buddhist philosophy that we might ask today. Apr 30, 2025 · The Story of the Indo-Greek King who embraced Buddhism. After stating that no individual part of the chariot gives it its existence, Nagasena notes that in the same way, the culmination of these parts is no more a “chariot” than the individual parts themselves. The dialogue touches on many subtle problems of Buddhist philosophy and practice, dealing with them with wit and eloquence. com Milinda: “I have not, Nagasena, spoken a falsehood. Jan 11, 2025 · Summary: The English translation of the Milindapanha (lit. Milinda asks Nagasena if any physical or mental components (such as hair, flesh, feelings, perceptions) constitute his identity as Nagasena. It is on account of its having all these things--the pole, and the axle, the wheels, and the framework, the ropes, the yoke, the spokes, and the goad--that it comes under the generally understood term, the designation in common use, of "chariot. The king asks the following question to Nagasena: Does he who is born remain the same to become another? Question: What was the subject of the conversation between King Milinda and Nagasena when they spoke about the chariot?no permanent selfrebirthrenunciationsuffering King Milinda is a brilliant and formidable King. Jun 25, 2019 · King Milinda's Questions Among the King's many questions to Nagasena are what is the doctrine of no-self, and how can rebirth happen without a soul? How is a not-self morally responsible for anything? What is the distinguishing characteristic of wisdom? What are the distinguishing characteristics of each of the Five Skandhas? Within the Questions of Milinda A chariot from ancient Greece. Until he meets Nagasena, he out questions and out logics all of the Buddhist monks of that day. Also, nothing outside of them is the chariot either. The text examines fundamental Buddhist teachings about identity and the law of action and consequence. ” PART TWO COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE P AND C TEXT PASSAGES BY PASSAGES BOOK I BAHIRAKATHA OR INTRODUCTORY SECTION (A) Opening Of The Text. - his chariot? Normally one defines a chariot a means for An unknown Buddhist on the self: King Milinda’s chariot’ looks at a para-canonical Buddhist text, in which King Milinda questions a monk, Nagasena, who demonstrates the Buddhist concept of anatta, or no-self. Thus giving the "chariot" is just a generally understood term for common use. I expressed some doubt that ‘the Venerable Nagasena’ who tells the parable, really is just ‘a collection of parts’. None of the individual things were the chariot, so where is the vehicle. His answers to questions about Buddhism posed by Menander I (Pali: Milinda), the Indo-Greek king of northwertern India, are recorded in the Milinda Pañha. Introduction In the land of the Bactrian Greeks, there was a city called Sagala, a great centre Oct 31, 2024 · [2] From: Milindapanha (questions of King Milinda) (1) An illustration used by Nagasena to demonstrate that terms represent combinations of components, just like a chariot is not any single part but a collection of parts. 1. Nagasena: Is it the axle that is the chariot? Milinda: Certainly not. Just as the chariot is not one singular independent thing, but it is composed of parts, in the same way, that which we call the "self" (atman) is not a singular independent entity, but it is likewise composed of Jul 30, 2025 · Nagasena is a pivotal figure in Buddhism, known for his philosophical dialogue with King Milinda, where he clarifies spiritual concepts and offers profound insights, showcasing his role as a wise sage in Buddhist discourse. Question: Question 21 ptsWhat was the subject of the conversation between King Milinda and Nagasena when they spoke about the chariot?renunciationno permanent selfrebirthsuffering Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Nagasena's Chariot Analogy, Hume on the Idea of the Self, Locke's Definition of "Person" and more. It was preserved in Ceylon and later translated into Pāli. Boperachchi). ” But when I say to him: “If, great king, you came in a chariot, tell me about the chariot!” he cannot prove that there is any chariot. Tiziana Pierini Dr. The Questions of King Milinda deals with some of the thorniest questions of Buddhism, religion and existence. Nāgasena was satisfied with the king’s answer. It discusses their debate on personal identity and rebirth through the use of analogies and examples. Likewise, a person The debate with King Milinda and Nagasena happened in India, with the king being a ruler of an Indo- Greek kingdom in northern India and Pakistan. Jun 11, 2021 · This is a summary of the parable of Nagasena (a Bhikkhu) and the Chariot as found in the Buddhist text The Questions of King Milinda. Nov 10, 2019 · Nagasena,birthplace is Kashmir,king milinda and nagasena,nagasena meaning,nagasena chariot,questions of king milinda conversation with nagasena,milinda panha p Nagasena's reply is to the effect that King Milinda has spoken a falsehood as to his arriving on a chariot since a chariot has no ontological existence which in and of itself makes it a chariot. Introduction The Milinda Pa¤ha is an ancient and much venerated book of the Buddhists, indeed regarded so highly as to be in-cluded by the Burmese in the Pali Canon. In this essay, I’ll take you on a journey through some key themes and ideas in this remarkable work Feb 4, 2025 · The tale of Arhat Nagasena and his renowned conversation with King Milinda is documented in the Milinda Panha (The Questions of King Milinda), an important text within the Theravada Buddhist tradition. , referred to There is a tradition that Nagasena brought to Thailand the first representation of the Buddha, the Emerald Buddha. The chariot Each of the aggregates when examined individually is empty, no essence, no permanence whatsoever. Using the analogy of a chariot, Nagasena demonstrates to Milinda that the person named “Nagasena” cannot be identified with any part of his body or consciousness nor with any sum of these parts, but also cannot be conceived as existing independently of his parts. b. In the dialogue itself, Nagasena plays a part akin to the Platonic Socrates, overcoming one by one each of King Milinda's misgivings by rational argument and apt simile. With this, Nagasena rebuffs the King with his own reasoning, branding him a liar in front of the thousands of attendant priests. He then compared himself to the chariot, saying that he too – the person called ‘Nagasena’ – was just a collection of parts. This document provides an overview of the questions King Milinda asks the monk Nagasena about Buddhist philosophy. , that there takes place this denomination ‘chariot,’ this designation, this conceptual term, a current appellation, and a mere name. Credit: Hutchinson’s Story of the Nations, Archive. Nagasena says KING MILINDA AND HIS CHARIOT NowMilindathekingwentuptowherethevenerable Nāgasenawas,andaddressedhimwith the greetings and compliments of friendship and courtesy, and took his seat respectfully apart. The “Questions of King Milinda” is a Buddhist text created around 100 BCE. C. Nagasena is not known through other sources besides the Milinda Panha and this legend. Feb 20, 2021 · Questions of King Menander: Nagasena and the Chariot wonkmonk 4. The narrative proceeds in a cyclical fashion as the King proposes a difficult question of Nagasena, who responds typically with either a tale about the Buddha in some previous life, or an analogy. Jan 1, 2007 · The Milindapanha is one of the great classics of Pali Buddhist literature, a spirited dialogue between the Greek king Milinda and the Buddhist sage Nagasena. “questions of King Milinda”) an ancient Buddhist text originally written in Northern India around the 1st century BCE. The Milinda Panha is the source of numerous Buddhist stories and theories, but its Simile of the Chariot; attributed to Nagasena, is perhaps its most well-known. Again, Milinda replies “No,” to each candidate. Referring to the discussion between Milinda and Nagasena: Why King Milinda does not consider all together - pole, axle, wheels etc. Nagasena rejects all of these. People are similar to chariots in that regard. Nagasena begins, and Milinda answers. How then did you come, on foot, or in a chariot?' 'I did not come, Sir, on foot. G. aueobq rg w16g41 pnhlf aaqs b5f5lm5 dhdcho i3cl r0l yes